my wrath incurred!!!

i am so pissed!! andy roddick lost to that ugly thing called roger federer. AND. this piece of shit you call a commentary article was so totally bias towards the latter.

here's the article: http://www.wimbledon.org/en_GB/news/articles/2005-07-03/200507031120403812798.html

what's with all those rhetorical questions mocking fun at roddick??

It was difficult not to have sympathy with him. He was producing some great stuff. The problem was that Federer's stuff was greater still.

so obviously bias right??? AND. justification of my accusations may be seen in how the writer posted an unflattering photo of roddick and that ugly thing's got pictures that are more showy etc.

i am royally pissed.